Against modern Indian music there has been an accusation by a certain select group - that modern Indian music is not Indian at all. Additionally some would be reluctant to concede that it is even music. About this second opinion I withhold any discussion. But as to the comment that modern Indian music is not Indian - that is an intriguing point of view which in my opinion deserves to be discussed. The reason being that this charge has been made by a select and quite influential group of music aficionados. This group is of the firm opinion that: a) modern Indian music does not follow any of the raag note patterns of Indian music, b) this music has none of the characteristics of being typically Indian – in other words Indian folk-music, and c) for accompaniment with this music, it is all too easy to use foreign 'orchestral' music.
We need to keep in mind especially that the above accusation has been made primarily around Indian Film music. It is through Film music that Modern Indian music finds its most popular expression. Among the above mentioned group of critics is a section which has cultivated the strong viewpoint that the melding of Indian music and western music and the joint use of these different styles of music is not possible. A similar view is held even by Aakaashbaani (All India Radio), in whose light classical music department (not denoted as modern music) the harmonium is considered to be an 'untouchable' instrument.
Here I would like to say a few words about that unfortunate instrument, the harmonium.
Developed through a fusion and modification of the 'accordion' and the 'organ', it is by far the most popular musical instrument in India. The use of this instrument is universal; it finds favour from leading exponents of classical Indian music, the lowliest of music students and even the street singer. Thus it has become our national musical instrument. Talented classical musicians (prominent among these being Ustaad Abdul Kareem Khan, Fayyaaz Khan and Akhtari Bai) have given us such disparate styles of music as Thumri, Bhajan, Qawwaali and Gazal; these as well as artists of 'adhunik' (modern) music have and continue to use the harmonium to accompany their music.
I believe that it was Kobiguru Rabindranath (Tagore) who first opined against the use of the harmonium. He understood that a student of music just beginning would become a slave to the fixed chromatic scale of the harmonium and would thus suffer a loss of spontaneity in the expression of melody and voice. The logic of his pronouncement is of course undeniable. However, why it is that the harmonium is condemned for consideration even for the purpose of accompaniment, is beyond my understanding.
It is of course the sole prerogative of the composer to choose the musical instrument that will accompany musical works of his own creation. The 'organ' has been used as such an accompaniment in almost all of the popular gramophone recordings of Rabindrasangeet.
It is my belief that if soft chords (using two or more notes) were to be used in the ‘organ’ as part of the background music, it would greatly enhance the expressive beauty of RabindraGeeti and make it simpler and more beautiful. But even if today's composer believes that the accompaniment of the 'organ' or the 'harmonium' will enhance the expression of his music, he will be unable to use them. Why ? Because it is a foreign instrument. The destroyer of all that is characteristic of Indian music. In order to accept this premise to be true, we would need to eliminate hundreds of recordings made by artists that we consider to be 'ustaads' in our musical tradition. If these classical artists could conclude that the harmonium helped rather than hindered their musical expression, then why should modern composers not accept the harmonium as accompaniment.
On the other hand Indian instrumental artists (as with the violin) have with the harmonium been quite successful in creating a new kind of sound which is heard nowhere else in the world. I know many such instrumentalists who have achieved such dexterity with the instrument that they can, while maintaining the expressiveness and particular characteristics of Indian music, assert their equality with the world's leading 'accordionists'. It is solely an attitude of 'status quo' and orthodoxy that is responsible for the ban on the 'harmonium' at AakaashBaani. Music composers and artists surely would not ignorantly use this instrument if it did not facilitate their expression of musical beauty.
Although there is no such ban in Film music, here too perhaps only one song in a hundred will use the harmonium, and even then only if the song is by a Baijee (courtesan style) or in Qawwaali style. Oh well, as a result of AakashBaani's animosity towards the harmonium, it is not the harmonium which is losing appeal; rather, it is AakashBaani whose popularity is consistently being eroded. Now let us return to our topic. Before embarking on an extended discussion of the theoretical possibilities resulting from the melding of Indian and western music, it is necessary to assess the practical impact that such a melding has had. Since the last century, just as India has assimilated western culture via its language, arts, dress, etc., so has it absorbed and assimilated the western music in exactly the same way.
A progressive culture is never afraid of foreign influence. Even when an excessiveness of imitation does manifest itself, our culture will ultimately reject it and progress towards an all encompassing unity. The long history of India is full of accounts of our defeats at the hands of foreigners and tales of their reigns. However none were successful in uprooting our civilization and culture and sowing the seeds of foreign influence in our soil; rather, India has always managed to enhance its own greatness by absorbing what’s good in them.
Then followed the age of British rule. The Indian mind was especially attracted to the western way of thinking. European culture and its influence on Indian literature and art found an appropriate expression in the age of the Renaissance of Bengal.
In the field of literature, in Kobiguru Rabindranath, we found the joint expression of both cultures and in painting it was Abanindranath. In music, though the analogy is not that straightforward, the influence of western music is none the less present in a similar way. We will discuss this later. But as to the question of whether it is possible to meld Indian music with western music, we have already found the answer in recent times and in the tremendous popularity of ninety-nine percent of 'adhunik' (popular) songs of the last half a century. Proof of this is in the fact that our population has accepted the 'adhunik' songs composed using a successful synthesis of eastern and western melody. In the creation of art it is not only the personality of the creator (artist) which finds expression; also reflected and evident in it is the contemporary age and the influence of the prevailing environment. Our classical vocal and instrumental artists are themselves the creators of melody. At the moment of delivery, they improvise 'extempore' melody, and based upon the individuality of the artist the same raag/raagini finds unique expression. Despite restrictions on the notes of a raag or raagini, they elicit different expressions of mood according to the moment or time of day. The technique of development of a raag used fifty years ago is not at all the same as the method used today. If you listen to the voice of Ustaad Salaamat Ali elaborating on the raags in 'Darbaari Kanada' or 'Baagesri' you will understand what I want to say. The spontaneous manner in which he uses 'chordal' and 'chromatic' variations in voice while singing the Thumri, I would characterize as a completely modern style, but the purity of raag-based music is present in full measure in it.